|
|
Post by thrillos on Aug 17, 2010 17:24:32 GMT 10
results = more ppl behind the goals
at the start there were at times up to 30-40 of us. If the teams was winning this number grows. If the team is losing this number declines.
we saw it this year at the end where for one game there was only 3 ppl because the team was 2nd last
|
|
|
|
Post by Blaze on Aug 17, 2010 17:28:26 GMT 10
Agreed.....but at the rockdale game there were a bunch of people who were only there for that one match. It's disappointing but that's the way football is.
|
|
|
|
Post by paoktzi on Aug 17, 2010 19:59:52 GMT 10
so all i can say is imagine if we do get results popopopo the new dawn scum will be turning in there sleep
|
|
|
|
Post by mr_football on Sept 7, 2010 16:56:17 GMT 10
i dont want to get political here but i can tell you more than 60% of those achievements those fat fucks who think they run the gestapo did not move a finger .... the opportunity just fell into their laps
results are key and you will see next yr our crowds will be down
|
|
|
|
Post by mr_football on Sept 7, 2010 16:57:50 GMT 10
Agreed.....but at the rockdale game there were a bunch of people who were only there for that one match. It's disappointing but that's the way football is. agreed blaze |
|
|
|
Post by mr_football on Sept 7, 2010 16:58:35 GMT 10
results = more ppl behind the goals at the start there were at times up to 30-40 of us. If the teams was winning this number grows. If the team is losing this number declines. we saw it this year at the end where for one game there was only 3 ppl because the team was 2nd last well said thrillos you are a thirio |
|
|
|
Post by paoktzi on Sept 7, 2010 21:08:05 GMT 10
i dont want to get political here but i can tell you more than 60% of those achievements those fat fucks who think they run the gestapo did not move a finger .... the opportunity just fell into their laps results are key and you will see next yr our crowds will be down Solz you sound like a bitter gria re lol explain yourself when you talk otherwise it dont mean anything vre |
|
|
|
Post by mr_football on Sept 7, 2010 22:15:01 GMT 10
im not bitter mate if i was bitter i wouldnt show upto games .. i just dont want people to believe half the bullshit the board says
|
|
|
|
Post by paoktzi on Sept 8, 2010 8:34:06 GMT 10
im not bitter mate if i was bitter i wouldnt show upto games .. i just dont want people to believe half the bullshit the board says Your not saying anything but re file |
|
|
|
Post by phoenix on Sept 9, 2010 20:18:34 GMT 10
For the first time in Olympic history we got a long-term home ground, the 25 year lease at Belmore Sports Ground. If the Bulldogs weren't involved then Olympic would have had nothing. Let's not bullsh*t to ourselves. |
|
|
|
Post by mini on Sept 9, 2010 20:22:01 GMT 10
It doesn't matter, it is still a massive achievement.
|
|
|
|
Post by paoktzi on Sept 9, 2010 21:25:34 GMT 10
For the first time in Olympic history we got a long-term home ground, the 25 year lease at Belmore Sports Ground. If the Bulldogs weren't involved then Olympic would have had nothing. Let's not bullsh*t to ourselves. I think if the bulldogs were not invovled it would of been a lot easier for the club. as mr indi has said the devil is in the details what a statement especially with football. time to have positivity no need for negativity when positives things are happening |
|
|
|
Post by kon12 on Sept 10, 2010 8:20:27 GMT 10
and if the bulldogs were not coming back there would be no referbishment
|
|
|
|
Post by thrillos on Sept 10, 2010 8:20:40 GMT 10
I think if the bulldogs were not invovled it would of been a lot easier for the club. Incorrect. Council would never have given Olympic a 25 years lease. They have always and would always only give a 2 year lease as Olympic has been and never will be considered as the main tenant in the council's eyes. The deal was only done because of the bulldogs. Olympic was used to help secure the $5.9M funding as it was only granted on the proviso it was to develop a multi-sport facility. SImilar to OKI Jubilee when we were there. |
|
|
|
Post by paoktzi on Sept 10, 2010 8:28:25 GMT 10
I think if the bulldogs were not invovled it would of been a lot easier for the club. Incorrect. Council would never have given Olympic a 25 years lease. They have always and would always only give a 2 year lease as Olympic has been and never will be considered as the main tenant in the council's eyes. The deal was only done because of the bulldogs. Olympic was used to help secure the $5.9M funding as it was only granted on the proviso it was to develop a multi-sport facility. SImilar to OKI Jubilee when we were there. Yes but who was kicked out of OKI Jubilee after the grant happened? |
|
